Heutagogy and cybergogy strategies in Indonesian language learning at higher education institutions

Muhammad Sabbardi; Subyantoro; Rahayu Pristi

doi:10.53873/culture.v11i1.566

Authors

Muhammad Sabbardi STIT Internasional Muhammadiyah Batam
Subyantoro Universitas Negeri Semarang
Rahayu Pristi Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53873/culture.v11i1.566

Keywords:

Cybergogy, Heutagogy, Indonesian Language

Abstract

This research investigates how the combination of heutagogy and cybergogy can enhance students' abilities in understanding, speaking, reading, and writing in the Indonesian language. Through the General Basic Course (MKDU), the Indonesian language plays a crucial role in education in Indonesia as it is the official language in all fields. The Indonesian language course aims to improve students' communication skills in Indonesian effectively and correctly. In addressing these issues, the discussion context focuses on alternative ideas for teaching approaches in higher education to encourage Indonesian language educators to present learning in an effective and enjoyable manner. To achieve this, the author proposes two strategies: heutagogy, which involves educating by encouraging students to have self-directing skills, and cybergogy, a strategy that incorporates learning by utilizing information technology. The implications of this research can be used as a foundation for the development of language learning methods in higher education institutions.

References

Arifin, M. N., Heriyanto, E., Kurniadi, D., & Arvianti, I. (2024). Analyzing grammar errors among Hellotalk users and proposing effective correction strategies. English Learning Innovation, 5(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v5i1.31569

Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076

Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-century self-determined learners. In B. Gros, Kinshuk, & M. Maina (Eds.), The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3

Danim, S. (2015). Pedagogi, Andragogi dan Heutagogi. Alfabeta.

Daud, W. A. A. W., Teck, W. K., Ghani, M. T. A., & Ramli, S. (2019). The needs analysis of developing mobile learning application for cybergogical teaching and learning of Arabic language proficiency. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(8), 33–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i8/6206

Gaol, P. L. (2020). Studi literatur: transformasi metode pembelajaran pasca pandemi dari pedagogi, andragogi ke heutagogi. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Administrasi 4.0, 187–192. https://knia.stialanbandung.ac.id/index.php/knia/article/view/241/pdf

Hase, S, & Kenyon, C. (2001). Moving from andragogy to heutagogy: Implications for VET. Proceedings of Research to Reality: PuttingVET Research to Work: Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37357847_Moving_from_andragogy_to_heutagogy_implications_for_VET

Hase, Stewart, & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8766

Hotimah. (2020). Pendekatan heutagogi dalam pembelajaran di era society 5.0. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP). Vol. 1. No. 2. Hal.152-159.

Marie, B. L. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self determined learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56–71.

Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (2013). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. David Fulton Publishers.

Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Diunduh pada https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/

Purmanah, N. I., Nuryana, N., & Puspitasari, E. (2017). Penerapan self-assessment untuk menumbuhkan kesadaran siswa tentang makna belajar pada mata pelajaran IPS di MTS Sabilul Chalim, Leuwimunding, Majalengka. Jurnal Edueksos, 6(1), 65–80. https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/edueksos/article/view/1942

Sabbardi, M. (2018). “Heutagogi zaman now”. Majalah Sahabat Guru. Edisi Agustus 2018. Hal.94-95

Sanjaya, W. (2016). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Kencana Prenada Media.

Septianisha, N. I., Anggraeni, K. D., Hilda, N. R., Azhar, M. S., & Ulya, V. H. (2021). Cybergogy: konsep dan implementasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. ProSandika: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pekalongan, 153–164. https://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/sandika/article/view/554

Sudjana, N. (2014). Dasar-dasar proses belajar mengajar. Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sumarsono. (2020). The paradigms of heutagogy and cybergogy in the transdisciplinary perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 52(3), 172–182. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPP/article/view/22882

Syafii, Djatmiko, T., & Cahyono, A. (2006). Materi dan Pembelajaran Kertakes SD. Universitas Terbuka.